The American Colonization Society (ACS) and Liberia: Unforeseen Legacies of U.S. Intervention
Introduction
The founding of Liberia by the American Colonization Society (ACS) in the early 19th century represents a pivotal moment in US foreign intervention, initiating a series of events whose consequences reverberated beyond its historical time frame. The ACS was founded in 1816 with the primary intention of repatriating free African Americans and emancipated slaves to a colony in West Africa. The society believed in the concept of colonization as a solution to racial tensions and the issue of slavery in the United States and aimed to recruit volunteers from among free African Americans and emancipated slaves in the United States. These individuals were offered the opportunity to emigrate to Liberia with the promise of land and the prospect of building a new life free from the racial oppression and economic hardship they often faced in the United States. While some individuals volunteered willingly, others were pressured or even coerced into emigrating.
The motivations behind the ACS were multifaceted, driven by a blend of humanitarian, racial, and political factors. Some members genuinely believed that resettling freed African Americans in Africa would offer them opportunities unavailable in the United States due to racial discrimination and economic challenges. Others saw this resettlement as a means to remove freed slaves, whom they considered a threat to social order and stability. Additionally, some believed the ACS aimed to do good by spreading Christianity and “civilization” in Africa. These efforts were controversial and faced criticism from both abolitionists and advocates of racial equality. Debates about its motives continue, and historical inquiry has wrestled with contrasting perspectives of whether the ACS was a conservative pro-slavery entity, an emancipationist organization, or neither. From its inception, the ACS’s initiatives, including land annexations and economic ventures, unfolded amidst tensions between Americo-Liberian settlers and the indigenous population. These actions perpetuated power imbalances and social disparities, thus shaping the trajectory of Liberia’s socio-economic landscape. However, the most pernicious consequence of the ACS’s actions lay in the foundation it established for exploitative labor practices.
After declaring independence from the ACS in 1847, the nation grappled with financial instability, repeatedly teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. American corporation Firestone’s history in Liberia was marked by its ambitious efforts to establish a dominant presence in the nation’s rubber industry. Harvey Firestone, seeking to secure a consistent source of rubber for his company’s tire manufacturing operations, identified Liberia’s fertile lands as an ideal location for large-scale rubber plantations. Firestone’s vision involved extensive land leases and labor requirements, aiming to control every aspect of the rubber production process, from cultivation to processing. This ambition posed a significant threat to Liberian sovereignty as it risked placing the nation’s economy and resources under the influence and control of a foreign corporation. In 1925, Firestone negotiated a 99-year lease of up to one million acres of land, and a last minute addition of a twenty-five million dollar loan attached to the concession which was intended to ensure that American corporate influence dominated. This lease agreement granted Firestone considerable authority over Liberian territory and resources, which raised concerns among Liberians and international observers about the erosion of the nation’s sovereignty. Concurrently, reports by the International Commission of Enquiry to Liberia surfaced regarding the exploitation of indigenous Liberian workers by the Americo-Liberian elite, descendants of the American freedmen who established Liberia in the 19th century.
The ACS’s establishment of Liberia, often perceived as a solution to racial tensions, unfolded into enduring complexities, one of which surfaced in the form of the labor scandal nearly a century later. Examining the continuum from the ACS’s actions to the later crisis establishes a broader trend of US interventions having enduring, unforeseen implications, positioning the Liberian case as emblematic of a larger phenomenon where ostensibly short-term actions possess far-reaching and unforeseen consequences within US foreign relations.
Historical Background: The ACS and the Establishment of Liberia
Life Membership Certificate for American Colonization Society, ca. 1840.
The ACS’s formation in 1816 brought together a motley crew of interests, ranging from white slaveholders to reformers and anti-slavery advocates. Each party had its own distinct agenda, united only by the shared notion that black individuals did not belong within the nation. For many Americans in the nineteenth century, the contradiction of slavery against the revolutionary ideals of egalitarianism and Christian principles of equality was stark. While some sought to address the moral dilemma of slavery by facilitating the colonization and removal of free Black people, others saw it as a pragmatic solution to racial tensions and economic concerns. Enslavers saw colonization as a means to alleviate the perceived threat of free Black communities and maintain the institution of slavery. For them, the removal of free Blacks offered a way to reinforce racial hierarchy and preserve their economic interests. In contrast, reformers and members of religious institutions viewed colonization as a humanitarian endeavor aimed at promoting the welfare of free Blacks. They believed that resettlement in Africa would offer them greater opportunities for freedom and self-determination, away from the oppression and discrimination they faced in the United States. Additionally, federal government officials saw colonization as a potential solution to the growing racial tensions and social unrest in the country. By supporting the ACS, they hoped to mitigate conflicts arising from the presence of free Black communities and maintain stability within the nation.
Before the ACS’s establishment, figures like Paul Cuffee, an African American businessman and abolitionist, advocated for settling formerly enslaved people in Africa. His efforts gained traction, and the British government, free Black US leaders, and some Congress members supported him. Cuffee’s venture to Sierra Leone in 1815 laid the groundwork for the formation of the ACS, as it encouraged white proponents of colonization, including prominent Americans such as Henry Clay, John Randolph of Roanoke, and Justice Bushrod Washington, to form an organization to repatriate those free African Americans. However, many free African Americans were apprehensive about the ACS, fearing its divergence from American democratic principles and its perceived domination by Southerners and slaveholders.
Early nineteenth-century ACS records highlighted its diverse objectives, including “benefits for the free colored population through emigration to Liberia,” the advancement of “civilization,” and the spread of Christianity in Africa. The complexity led to debates about the ACS’s true intentions: Was its primary stance in favor of slavery, seeking to expel free African Americans? Alternatively, did it function as an abolitionist organization adopting a conservative approach toward incremental freedom, appealing to white slaveholders? Some viewed it as a Christian missionary entity, while others perceived it as a nuanced amalgamation that eluded simple categorization. These intricate layers of motivations, tensions, and differing perspectives encapsulate the foundation upon which the ACS established Liberia. Beyond its immediate context, this historical moment reflects not only the societal dilemmas of the era but also highlights a significant chapter in US foreign relations, revealing the mutual influence of ideologies and interests that shaped America’s engagement with the broader world.
ACS’s Impact and Socio-Political Shifts in Early Liberia (1822-1847)
Treaty between American Colonization Society and African Kings, May 11, 1825.
As free African Americans settled along the Liberian coast, they asserted control over land, trade routes, and local resources, creating a policy of dominance over the indigenous populations. The settlement witnessed the rise of an elite class, the Americo-Liberians, who monopolized state power and navigated complex relations with the indigenous populace while creating barriers between the “civilized” and the “uncivilized.” They actively monopolized state power by assuming key positions within the government, including legislative and administrative roles. This enabled them to enact laws and policies that favored their interests and perpetuated their dominance over both indigenous populations and incoming settlers. Additionally, the Americo-Liberians skillfully navigated complex relations with the indigenous populace by forming alliances with certain indigenous leaders while marginalizing others who posed a threat to their authority. This strategy allowed them to maintain control over the political landscape and suppress potential challenges to their rule. Furthermore, the Americo-Liberians implemented policies and practices that reinforced social and cultural divisions between themselves and the indigenous communities. This included promoting Western ideals of civilization and education among the settler population while denying similar opportunities to the indigenous peoples, thereby perpetuating a hierarchical social structure based on notions of superiority and inferiority.
Jehudi Ashmun, a White American religious leader, and educator became a pivotal figure in this period in Liberia as an agent of the ACS. He played a substantial role in expanding the colony’s territory, often through forceful annexations of tribal lands. In his biography, written by Ralph Randolph Gurley, an advocate of the separation of races and a major force in the American Colonization Society, details Ashmun’s journey to Africa in 1822. Gurley expressed Ashmun’s “ardent affection” for the cause of African Colonization yet more prominently depicted Ashmun’s ambitious plan focused on extensive trade endeavors, which could benefit both himself and the Society by enhancing their resources and objectives.
During his time in Liberia, Ashmun used aggressive tactics in his negotiations to increase agricultural production, annex more lands from neighboring tribes, and exploit commercial opportunities in the interior. These efforts often involved pressuring indigenous leaders to cede land to the settlers. He was willing to resort to coercion and even military force to expand the colony’s boundaries and assumed a leadership position in revitalizing what he perceived as a demoralized settlement. He built the defenses of Monrovia against attacks by Indigenous tribes, as well as against slave raiders to ensure the security of the settlement. Furthermore, Ashmun actively pursued commercial opportunities in the interior of Liberia, seeking to exploit natural resources and establish trade networks with the United States, Great Britain, and Europe. These endeavors often involved the exploitation of Indigenous labor for infrastructural projects and agricultural endeavors.
The zealous actions of Ashmun and the ACS during this time created tensions within the struggling settlement and had longer-term repercussions. His actions set in motion a series of developments that reshaped the socio-political landscape of Liberia, empowering the Americo-Liberians to dominate the government well into the 20th century, leading to power struggles and conflicts with indigenous populations.
The ACS’s policies and Ashmun’s initiatives not only bolstered the settlers but also created tensions and discontent within the indigenous groups, mainly due to the deceitful methods employed in land acquisition. Moreover, the commercial endeavors pursued by the Americo-Liberian settlers paved the way for the exploitation of indigenous populations. This exploitation manifested through labor contributions for various infrastructural projects such as roads, rest homes, barracks, and their employment on government farms. These exploitative practices, initiated by Ashmun, persisted until they culminated in the labor scandal that surfaced much later.
From Ashmun’s and the ACS’s trade aspirations and exploitative practices emerged not only racial tensions but also enduring exploitative labor practices that left a profound imprint. These actions instigated racial hierarchies, effectively subjugating the indigenous populations within Liberia. The ramifications of the ACS’s actions resonated beyond their immediate occurrence, fundamentally shaping the country’s socio-political landscape. The lasting implications of these policies established by the ACS were foundational, leading to enduring disparities and societal divisions throughout Liberia’s history. Overall, the rise of the Americo-Liberian elite marked a period of significant political and social transformation in Liberia, characterized by the consolidation of power among a privileged few and the perpetuation of inequalities between different segments of society.
Establishment of Labor Practices from ACS Initiatives
The establishment of Liberia in the early 19th century under the auspices of the American Colonization Society brought forth significant changes in labor practices, particularly in the regions surrounding the St. John and Sinoe Rivers. These settlements, established near these waterways by Black Quakers and freedmen, sponsored by the ACS, featured substantial farmhouses and cultivated plantations ranging from 10 to 30 acres. They were integral to Liberia’s agricultural expansion and introduced new agricultural opportunities to the area. However, these developments also precipitated exploitative labor dynamics.
Kelly, Captn. St. Pauls River, Liberia at its mouth. [New York: Endicott & Co. Lith, 1867].
Before the arrival of Americo-Liberians, Liberia was inhabited by roughly one and a half million native people from around 16 distinct tribes, such as the Kru and Grebo, who lived in the country’s “hinterlands”. The leading families of each indigenous group managed their communities following traditional customs. In the early part of the 20th century, the Hinterland groups provided labor to the central government for the construction of roads and free labor for the Spanish Island of Fernando Po. The approximately 15,000 Americo-Liberians exploited divisions among these indigenous groups to establish dominance, often oppressing the native populations through political control, cultural domination, economic exploitation, and forced labor. By manipulating these internal divisions, they weakened potential resistance and consolidated their power.
T. McCants Stewart, an African American visitor in the 1880s, noted that the relationship between the natives of Liberia and the American emigrants mirrored that of former slaves and Southern whites in the United States, with the natives being made to feel inferior. This attitude of superiority was indicative of deeper human rights abuses. Americo-Liberians not only perpetuated existing practices of African slavery but also devised a unique system of forced labor. This involved imposing taxes on tribes and coercing individuals, termed “pawns,” to toil on infrastructure projects like roads, barracks, and other public works.
Indigenous populations were coerced into providing labor for various infrastructure projects, including roads, rest homes, barracks and government farms. Historical accounts detail coercive land acquisition practices, where local leaders were allegedly pressured, sometimes at gunpoint, into surrendering vast stretches of coastal land to settlers in exchange for trade goods, supplies, weapons and rum, estimated at approximately $300. This exchange perpetuated imbalances and cemented exploitative labor practices, with Indigenous laborers receiving minimal or no compensation for their contributions.
By settling on the coast, African Americans took control of land, trade routes, and resources, which evolved into a policy aimed at dominating the indigenous populations surrounding the colonial settlement. These practices, initiated during Liberia’s founding years, endured throughout its history, leading to socio-economic disparities and political unrest. Exploitative and coercive labor practices initiated during this period persisted throughout Liberia’s history and the long term repercussions of these policies continued to have an effect on Liberia’s socio-economic and political structures. This exploitative labor system laid the foundation for practices that persisted, ultimately culminating in The Labor Scandal of 1929.
Liberian Labor Scandal (1929) and Firestone’s Involvement
The Liberian labor scandal of 1929 involved allegations of exploitation and forced labor of indigenous workers by the Americo-Liberian elite on Firestone rubber plantations, exposing systemic injustices and sparking international outrage. It was revealed that Liberian government officials, including President Charles D.B. King had granted extensive concessions to the Firestone Tire and Rubber Company without proper oversight or consideration for the rights of indigenous Liberians. These concessions granted Firestone control over vast tracts of land for rubber cultivation and allowed the company to establish a virtual monopoly over the rubber industry in Liberia. The scandal exposed a range of abuses, including forced labor practices, inhumane working conditions, and systematic exploitation of indigenous laborers on Firestone's rubber plantations. Workers were subjected to long hours, low wages, and harsh treatment, reminiscent of the exploitative labor practices prevalent during the colonial era. The scandal attracted international attention and condemnation, tarnishing Liberia’s reputation and undermining confidence in its government. It also highlighted deep-seated issues of corruption, nepotism, and inequality within Liberian society.
The scandal was not an isolated event but a manifestation of deeply entrenched economic and political factors rooted in the history of Liberia dating back to its foundational phases. Specifically, these include the emergence of a new class and exploitative labor practices. Labor exploitation was seen as the only viable option for generating revenue. The Liberian government, headed by the Americo-Liberians, relied on its indigenous population for free labor and export profits, using unpaid labor within the country and exporting labor as principal sources of income. The ACS’s involvement introduced new political and economic dynamics, such as the formation of a privileged settler class and the imposition of exploitative labor systems on indigenous populations. These actions laid the groundwork for the crisis in the 20th century, contributing to a socio-economic landscape characterized by inequality and exploitation.
Despite Liberia’s struggle with financial instability since the 1860’s due to the decline of its export trade, it wasn’t until 1926 that the United States asserted tangible economic interests in the region. This change marked a significant departure from previous economic engagements. This economic partnership between the Liberian government and the Firestone Tire and Rubber company was perceived as a solution to Liberia’s struggling economy which had been treading the edge of bankruptcy since the 1860s due to the severe decline in its export trade in coffee and other tropical products. Between 1906 and 1912, external loans from bankers shifted control of Liberia’s revenue streams to foreign entities. This partnership with Firestone granted the company extensive rubber-growing rights on a million acres of Liberian land. However, this move also carried the risk of jeopardizing Liberian sovereignty by entangling the nation in stringent loan terms with Firestone. The decision to pass such legislation without thoroughly considering its long-term implications reflects the precarious economic situation Liberia faced.
Christy, C. Report of the International commission of inquiry into the existence of slavery and forced labor in the republic of Liberia. International Commission of Inquiry into the Existence of Slavery and Forced Labor in the Republic of Liberia, 1931.
The revelation that the Liberian government was complicit in a system resembling forced labor, where indigenous Kru and Grebo workers were exported to Fernando Po, a Spanish-owned island, quickly escalated into an international scandal. This discovery caused global outrage and strong reactions, particularly from the United States, leading to significant diplomatic pressure on Liberia. In response to the accusations, the Liberian government denied the charges and invited a League of Nations commission of inquiry.
In 1930, a commission led by Cuthbert Christy, consisting of a white chairman nominated by the League of Nations and two black members, visited Liberia to investigate the claims. The commission’s report, submitted in September 1930, confirmed that laborers had been recruited under conditions scarcely distinguishable from slave raiding and slave trading. It found that the Liberian government had used forced or compulsory labor for various public projects such as road construction and utilities. Furthermore, the report revealed that labor intended for public works was sometimes diverted to private farms and plantations owned by high-ranking government officials and private citizens.
The report also provided several recommendations for Liberia, including breaking down the barriers between “civilized” and “uncivilized” populations and abandoning the policy of suppression. Additionally, it highlighted the deep-seated repercussions of Liberia’s settler community and its historical ties to the American Colonization Society from a century earlier, revealing the enduring legacy of exploitation and inequality. As a direct result of the Christy report, President Charles D. B. King and Vice President Allen N. Yancy resigned, marking a significant turning point in Liberia’s history.
The ACS’s establishment of a settler community with a precarious economic foundation, seeded the labor exploitation evident in this scandal. From the settlers’ engagement in commerce to Ashmun’s perpetuation of exploitative practices, these early actions not only entrenched power imbalances between the settlers and indigenous populations but also normalized exploitative labor practices within Liberian society. The systematic exploitation of indigenous labor for the benefit of the settler elite laid the groundwork for the labor scandal of 1929, as similar patterns of coercion and abuse persisted over the decades. This interconnectedness between Liberia’s origins and its 20th-century crisis highlights a broader pattern in US interventions globally.
Conclusion
The assumption that historical movements or organizations have only transient effects is often misguided; many such instances have yielded enduring repercussions. This holds particularly true in examining the actions catalyzed by the American Colonization Society in Liberia. The ACS, in seeking to alleviate domestic racial strife, inadvertently sowed the seeds of enduring disparities and societal divisions within Liberia. From the early settlements along the coast to the forceful annexation of tribal lands and the exploitation of indigenous populations, the ACS’s actions laid the groundwork for a socio-economic landscape fraught with power imbalances and exploitative labor practices.
The effects of the ACS era resounded loudly in the 20th-century labor crisis, where the interconnectedness between past actions and contemporary repercussions became starkly apparent. The Firestone concession, emblematic of Liberia’s economic struggles, encapsulated the nation’s entanglement in a web of foreign interests that compromised its sovereignty. The revelation of exploitative labor practices in the scandal echoed the coercive methods initiated by the ACS era settlements, establishing a troubling continuity across the centuries.
The case of Liberia stands as a testament to the complexities and unintended outcomes of foreign interventions. It emphasizes the critical need for a nuanced understanding of historical actions and their persistent implications, urging us to navigate global interventions with a profound awareness of their potential long-term ramifications. The lessons from Liberia showcase the imperative to scrutinize the interplay of motives, interests, and actions, striving for interventions that foster lasting positive change without inadvertently perpetuating enduring complexities.
View of the Colonial Settlement at Cape Montserado, June 1825.
About the Author
Valarmathi Vishnu is a Sri Lankan Tamil-American born and raised in Northern California. She attends the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada and is majoring in International Relations & Economics. Her research interests include American foreign policy, community-based research, and economic development.
Bibliography
(Full text with notes can be viewed here)
American Colonization Society, Henry Bonds, William Burke, and Rosabella Burke. “Personal Stories and ACS New Directions - the African-American Mosaic Exhibition | Exhibitions (Library of Congress).” Library of Congress. Last modified July 23, 2010. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html.
American Colonization Society, and African American Pamphlet Collection. A few facts respecting the American Colonization Society and the colony at Liberia for gratuitous distribution. Washington: Printed by Way and Gideon, 1830. Pdf. https://www.loc.gov/item/06030817/.
American Colonization Society. "American Colonization Society." Encyclopaedia Britannica. Accessed May 24, 2024. https://www.britannica.com/topic/American-Colonization-Society.
Banton, Caree. “Reviewed Work: Against Wind and Tide: The African American Struggle against the Colonization Movement.” Journal of the Civil War Era, vol. 5, no. 4, 2015, www.jstor.org/stable/26070360.
Carey, Mathew, and African American Pamphlet Collection. Reflections on the causes that led to the formation of the Colonization Society: Philadelphia, Printed by Wm. F. Geddes, 1832. Pdf. https://www.loc.gov/item/11008763/.
Carey, Mathew. Letters on the Colonization Society. Addressed to the Hon. C.F. Mercer, M.H.R.U.S. Philadelphia, Young, Printer, 1832. Pdf.
https://www.loc.gov/item/11008696/.
Chalk, Frank. 1967. “The Anatomy of an Investment: Firestone’s 1927 Loan to Liberia.” Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne Des Études Africaines 1 (1): 12–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/483972.
“Colonization - the African-American Mosaic Exhibition | Exhibitions (Library of Congress).” 2019. Loc.gov. Library of Congress. 2019.
https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam002.html.
Cuffee, Paul. 1812. Memoir of Captain Paul Cuffee, a Man of Color ... Written Expressly For, and Originally Printed In, the Liverpool Mercury. C. Peacock, 1812.
“Declaration of Principles Adopted by the American Colonization Society, January 20, 1870.” 1870. HathiTrust. January 20, 1870.
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=loc.ark:/13960/t06w9fz2x&seq=3.
Gardner, Leigh A. 2012. “The Rise and Fall of Sterling in Liberia, 1870-1943.” The Economic History Review Vol. 67 (Special Issue: The Renaissance of African Economic History): 1089–1112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24027264.
International Commission of Inquiry into the Existence of Slavery and Forced Labor in the Republic of Liberia., Christy, C. (1931). Report of the International commission of inquiry into the existence of slavery and forced labor in the republic of Liberia. Monrovia, Liberia, September 8, 1930. Washington: U.S. Govt. print. Off.. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/007912313/Home
Kelly, C. (1867) St. Pauls River, Liberia at its mouth. [New York: Endicott & Co. Lith] [Map] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/96684981/.
Letter from the Permanent Delegate of the Republic of Liberia to the Secretary-General of the League of Nations, Geneva, December 15, 1930.
Library of Congress. "History of Liberia: 1815 to 1817." Accessed May 17, 2024. https://www.loc.gov/collections/maps-of-liberia-1830-to-1870/articles-and-essays/history-of-liberia/1815-to-1817/.
Library of Congress. "1820 to 1847 | History Of Liberia: A Time Line | Articles and Essays | Maps of Liberia, 1830-1870 | Digital Collections." Accessed May 26, 2024. https://www.loc.gov/item/af000009/.
Life Membership Certificate for American Colonization Society. Certificate. American Colonization Society Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (3). Ca. 1840. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam002.html
Mackenzie, M. D. 1934. “Liberia and the League of Nations.” Journal of the Royal African Society 33 (133): 372–81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/716534.
Massachusetts Colonization Society. American Colonization Society and the colony at Liberia. Printed by Perkins & Marvin, 1832. Sabin Americana: History of the Americas, 1500-1926, https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=SABN&u=ubcolumbia&id=GALE%7CCY0107923001&v=2.1&it=r&aty=sso%3A+shibboleth Accessed 21 May 2024.
Muhammad, Baiyina W. 2010. “’Slavery in Liberia’: The “Afro-American Newspaper’’S Investigation of the Liberian Labor Scandal, 1926-1936.” Liberian Studies Journal 35 (2): 118–42.
Ralph Randolph Gurley. 1835. Life of Jehudi Ashmun, Late Colonial Agent in Liberia. Washington: Printed By James C. Dunn.
Santana, Genesys, "A Case of Double Consciousness Americo-Liberians and Indigenous Liberian Relations 1840-1930" (2012). HIM 1990-2015. 1797. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015/1797
Scruggs, Dalila. 2010. “‘The Love of Liberty Has Brought Us Here’: The American Colonization Society and the Imaging of African-American Settlers in Liberia - ProQuest.” Www.proquest.com. 2010. https://www.proquest.com/docview/614120108?sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses.
Seeley, Samantha. 2016. “Beyond the American Colonization Society.” History Compass 14 (3): 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12302.
Sundiata, I.K. 1980. Black Scandal, America and the Liberian Labor Crisis, 1929-1936. Philadelphia : Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
“The 1930 Enquiry Commission to Liberia.” 1931. Journal of the Royal African Society 30 (120): 277–90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/717046?seq=1.
“The African Repository and Colonial Journal 22 (1846).” 1846. HathiTrust. 1846. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.hwrch7&seq=15.
The African Repository and Colonial Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 129. Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Library of Congress (5). June 1825. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam002.html.
“The Fourth Annual Report of the American Society for Colonizing the Free People of Colour in the United States : And the Proceedings of the Society at Their Annual Meeting in the City of Washington, on the First Day of January, 1821.” n.d. Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA. Accessed November 7, 2023. https://www.loc.gov/item/91898198/.
Treaty between American Colonization Society and African Kings. Holograph. American Colonization Society Collection, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (4). May 11, 1825. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam002.html
Whyte, Christine. “A State of Underdevelopment: Sovereignty, Nation-Building and Labor in Liberia 1898–1961.” International Labor and Working-Class History, no. 92 (2017): 24–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26857460.
Wolters, Raymond. 2006. “The Travail of Liberia.” Edited by Ibrahim Sundiata. Diplomatic History 30 (2): 307–10. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24915098.